Irony, tyrion didn't even give half o the "justice" to the people he is dealing with and removes, that he recieves. Remember this when tyrion is the one who is the culprit and the suspect. It all comes down to the sovereign's strictness or common sense.
#MOUNT BLADE ACOK NO TAVERN KEEPER CODE#
There are some customs and traditions (such as the possibility of trial by battle), and there are some vague mentions of "westerosi laws" (like those that prohibit slavery), but there doesn't seem to be a code with specifics crimes and relative punishments to apply. After all if tyrion wants CR he wil have to deal with his family first.ĭecisions about punishments and court matters seem to rely upon the king or the lord in command in that specific place. Rather that, I was thinking when tyrion was asking Bronn this, is that he might will be in a place when he will consider (even if not do) ordering the murder of a child/children, then he will reflect that he knows a man for that job.
I disagree that he wants them to question it, I didn'T get any feeling from him about that. Yeah Bronn definietly wouldn't be a Davos. Later Tyrion will ask this same question of his father regarding Rhaegar's children and we'll get a chance to revisit this moral headache and indigestion Tyrion has now. Admittedly, that admiration is hypothetical until he has a Davos pull an Edric on him.
In Tyrion's favor he seems to want follower's who would actually question the morality of such an order. I don't really want to defend the moral distinctions in the baby killer spectrum, but I put it out there for what it might be worth.
0 kommentar(er)
